Visit our archive

Testing your tools.

There have been many discussions in the current discourse over tool development and customization by architects and designers. An equally important argument here is the testing of the tools. This testing can be a continuous process, through years of practice, when certain tools are used, calibrated and improved over the years, by software developers or by designers themselves. Custom tools need to be tested before being implemented in practice and a continuous calibration is required before its commercial (or rather practical) usage. However, practice is also a way of testing the tools, with continuous calibration and evolution, but feasibility depends on the costs and time involved.

Gregory Epps’ based firm (www.robofold.com) developed and released the tool ‘KingKong’ earlier this year after a series of in-house testing and calibration, matched with Epps’ years of experience in the field of curved folding. KingKong is a plugin for (a popular tool for Rhinoceros 3D) which simulates the process of curved folding in a digital medium, aids in designing architectural façade systems using curved folding, and has the potential of integrating with robotic fabrication for the panelling systems. This linear approach from design to fabrication forms the core of the firm, which is tested continuously through regular workshops in the London studio & fabrication facility of RoboFold. Some of the recent workshops incorporated the use of the tools created by RoboFold, specifically KingKong where participants were allowed to test the physical experimentations in the digital medium for prototypical fabrication.

process_robofold

Image courtesy: RoboFold Ltd. London

Two day workshops offered at RoboFold on a monthly basis are focussed on basic concepts of curved folding, tested in paper, with analysis and geometric studies in physical models. The data is then fed to digital medium and simulated and altered as per design requirements using the specialized tool. This is where the tool calibration comes into the picture; as such workshops form a part of the continuous tool development and testing by the firm. The digital simulations then lead to fabrication data and scaled prototypes are developed.

design_to_fabrication

Image courtesy: RoboFold Ltd. London

process_robofold_2

Image courtesy: RoboFold Ltd. London

 

Workshop_robofold

Image courtesy: RoboFold Ltd. London


The bigger argument here is about testing of customized tools created by designers. A gap, however, is observed in the design industry where designers and architects are creating their customized tools, and software companies are creating much advanced and stable platforms to be used by designers. An integration in the design and software industry is required today to create better working platforms and continuous design processes. A successful example of such an integration is Gehry Technologies (www.gehrytechnologies.com) emerging out of due to the need of a parallel AEC setup for complex modelling solutions. Such developments were on a halt for many years and have started to pick up recently with specialized modelling groups and computational design cells in design firms. Testing of tools is as important as creating the tools, to avoid a failure in the long run, before it is too late to realize and rectify the problem. Design and software industries need to be well integrated in this era of computational design, before designers take the challenge of creating custom tools.

By Sushant Verma

You must be logged in to post a comment.